Uniformization of precedents: for a materialization of the process in Habermasian pluralist communication

This article analyzes the judiciary system’s tendency to unify multiple jurisprudences and eventual conflicts with cultural diversity. The interpretation of laws is interpreted skepticism, as they might result in derogation legislative prerogatives. Critics have gained strength from actual procedure code's disposals that made compulsory judiciaries pronounce state national levels. present study investigates how judicial understandings could provide voices diversity cases eventually be submitted Courts' analyses. broad participation amicus curiae each biding case along full applicability atypical procedural agreements should conceived an indispensable condition give plain social validity maximum effectiveness pronunciation, especially whenever regarding most fundamentals concepts democratic archetypes resembling main ideas forecasted by second generation Frankfurt Philosophical School, among whom Jürgen Habermas considered field’s influential author. uses a dialect-inductive methodology confirm hypothesis both superior Courts must analyze various juridical divergent theses so bindings not lack effectiveness, using curiae's opinion thoroughly.